5.8×21mm
5.8×21mm DAP92 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Personal defense weapon | |||||||
Place of origin | China | |||||||
Service history | ||||||||
Used by | China | |||||||
Production history | ||||||||
Designed | 1994 | |||||||
Manufacturer | Norinco | |||||||
Specifications | ||||||||
Case type | Rimless, Bottleneck[1] | |||||||
Bullet diameter | 6.00 mm (0.236 in) [2] | |||||||
Neck diameter | 6.57 mm (0.259 in) | |||||||
Shoulder diameter | 7.77 mm (0.306 in) | |||||||
Base diameter | 7.95 mm (0.313 in) | |||||||
Rim diameter | 7.97 mm (0.314 in) | |||||||
Rim thickness | 1.13 mm (0.044 in) | |||||||
Case length | 21.00 mm (0.827 in) | |||||||
Overall length | 32.50 mm (1.280 in) | |||||||
Ballistic performance | ||||||||
|
The 5.8×21mm cartridge is a Chinese armor-piercing firearm cartridge.
The cartridge was designed for replacements of 7.62×25mm Tokarev–chambered small arms for the People's Liberation Army that would offer a wound as large as a standard 9×19mm Parabellum round.[3] This round is offered in both a standard, and subsonic version.[1] Both the QSZ-92 pistol and the QCW-05 Type 05 submachine gun are produced in this caliber as well as 9×19mm Parabellum.[4][5]
The 5.8×21mm is slightly less powerful than similar Western rounds, like the 5.7×28mm and 4.6×30mm. It has a steel-cored 3 g (46 gr) bullet that has a muzzle velocity of 530 m/s (1,700 ft/s) and muzzle energy of 420 J (310 ft·lb) from a submachine gun barrel. The round can penetrate 1.3 mm (0.051 in) of helmet steel plate, and 50 mm (2.0 in) of pine wood behind it, out to 100 meters.[6]
See also
References
- 1 2 "5.8x21 / MUNICION.ORG". Retrieved March 23, 2012.
- ↑ Handgunsmag.com. Retrieved 3 April 2013.
- ↑ Fortier, David M. (September 24, 2010). "Military Ammo Today". Guns & Ammo. Retrieved September 25, 2012.
- ↑ Popenker, Maxim. "Modern Firearms - QSZ-92 pistol". World Guns. Retrieved September 25, 2012.
- ↑ Popenker, Maxim. "Modern Firearms - Type 05 submachine gun". World Guns. Retrieved September 25, 2012.
- ↑ Where Next For PDWs? by Anthony G Williams