S v Williams (1995)
Not to be confused with S v Williams.
| S v Williams | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Constitutional Court of South Africa |
| Full case name | State v Williams and Others |
| Decided | 9 June 1995 |
| Citation(s) | [1995] ZACC 6, 1995 (3) SA 632 (CC), 1995 (7) BCLR 861 (CC) |
| Case history | |
| Prior action(s) | Referral from Cape Provincial Division |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Chaskalson P, Ackermann, Didcott, Kriegler, Langa, Madala, Mahomed, Mokgoro, O'Regan & Sachs JJ, Kentridge AJ |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Langa |
S v Williams and Others is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in which the court ruled that judicial corporal punishment is unconstitutional.[1] The decision was taken with respect to five different cases in which six juveniles were convicted by different magistrates and sentenced to receive a "moderate correction" of a number of strokes with a light cane.
The unanimous judgment, handed down on 9 June 1995, found the imposition of corporal punishment to be incompatible with the Interim Constitution of South Africa because it violates the right to human dignity and the protection against cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.[2]
References
- ↑ "Section 13: The abolition of JCP". Judicial Corporal Punishment in South Africa. World Corporal Punishment Research. 2005. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
- ↑ Angus, Laurel (1996). "Case Report: S v Williams". South African Journal on Human Rights. 12: 142–145.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 4/28/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.