Structural priming

Structural priming is a form of positive priming, in that it induces a tendency to repeat or more easily process a current sentence that is similar in structure to a previously presented prime. It is a phenomenon studied in the field of psycholinguistics. J. Kathryn Bock introduced it in 1986,.[1] Several paradigms exist to elicit structural priming.[1][2] Structural priming persists cross-linguistically.[3] One specific form of structural priming is syntactic priming.

Eliciting structural priming

Picture description

Bock introduced a picture description task[1] to investigate this phenomenon. In the study phase, at their own pace, participants read a list of sentences and observe a set of pictures. All these pictures describe events including an agent, patient, and theme. Half of the agents pictured are humans and the other half inanimate objects. This phase of the experiment was performed in an attempt to establish a "recognition memory" cover story. In the test phase, participants are asked to read a sentence expressing one of four conditions:

After reading a sentence, the participant repeats it. Following this repetition, the participant describes the picture.

Results of picture description

Consider a trial wherein the participant is reading a dative double-object construction, George gave the boy the ball. The subject is then significantly more likely to describe the a picture as X gave Y the Z instead of X gave the Z to Y. This persistence in sentential form is structural priming.[1]

Theory of structural priming

At least three theories exist to explain structural priming: syntactic repetition; thematic congruency and derivation of subjects.

Syntactic repetition

In the Bock study, the sentences presented match their primes in syntactic structure. This is trivially true for any type-type prime. However, other structural priming patterns exist that complicate this explanation.

Thematic congruency

A structure known as the unaccusative, which is unmarked morphologically in English, is capable of priming passive transitive sentences. The two constructions differ in syntax, but in both cases the subject takes a thematic, or at least non-agentive, thematic role.

Because the two constructions have this property in common, it has been suggested that such a thematic relational mapping is what allows structural priming.[4]

Derivation of subjects

A second possibility for describing the presence of unaccusative-passive priming is their shared characteristic of having a derived subject. For instance, the passive subject is said by some scholars of syntax to be derived via movement, or "smuggling," from the same position where it is generated in the active, to wit, the complement of the transitive verb.[5] Though the derivation of the unaccusative does not seem to be an identical process, it is nevertheless assumed to be derived.[6]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Bock, J.K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
  2. ↑ Potter, M & Lombardi, L. 1990. Regeneration in short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633-654.
  3. ↑ Loebell, H. & Bock, K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41(5), 791-824.
  4. ↑ Melinger, A. (2006). The influence of thematic role assignment on structural priming. Poster presented at the 19th annual CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
  5. ↑ Collins, C. (2005). A smuggling approach to the passive in english. Syntax, August, 81-120.
  6. ↑ Kim, C. (2006). Structural and Thematic Information in Sentence Production. Proceedings of NELS 37. UIUC.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 3/15/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.