I'm entitled to my opinion
I'm entitled to my opinion or I have a right to my opinion is a logical fallacy in which a person discredits any opposition by claiming that they are entitled to their opinion. The statement exemplifies a red herring. Whether one has a particular entitlement or right is irrelevant to whether one's assertion is true or false. To assert the existence of the right is a failure to assert any justification for the opinion. Such an assertion, however, can also be an assertion of one's own freedom or of a refusal to participate in the system of logic at hand.[1][2][3]
See also
References
- ↑ Whyte, Jamie (2004). "The Right to Your Opinion". Crimes Against Logic. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-144643-5.
- ↑ Deleuze, Gilles (1994). "The Image of Thought". Difference and Repetition. Paul Patton (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-08159-6.
- ↑ Whyte, Jamie (August 9, 2004). "Sorry, but you are not entitled to your opinion". The Times. News UK. Archived from the original on February 8, 2011. (subscription required (help)).
| |||||||||||
| Appeals to emotion | |||||||||||
| Genetic fallacies | |||||||||||
| Appeals to consequences |
| ||||||||||
| Other appeals | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Correlative-based fallacies | |
|---|---|
| Fallacies of illicit transference | |
| Deductive fallacies | |
| Inductive fallacies | |
| Questionable cause | |
| Vagueness / ambiguity | |
| Equivocation | |
| Question-begging fallacies | |
| |
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/23/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.